Saturday, July 17, 2021

Public Nuisance

 

                                                              Public Nuisance
 
The word public nuisance consists of two different word, viz, public and nuisance and both have to present together to constitute this act or omission. Public Nuisance is an act or omission that interferes or obstructs the interest or comfort of public at large. 
 
Public Nuisance is defined in section 268 of The Indian Penal Code 1860 which states that:-
 
The use of the word annoyance gives this definition a very wide meaning and includes a host of all those actions which may cause annoyance to the public at large. If it only hurts one person then still it is nuisance but come under the preview of private nuisance. Annoyance can be caused and it implies a perception of the victim and can include even , playing loud music, obstructing movement, blocking road or passages, activities which may harm others, businesses which affect the safety of public, life threatening trees or even animals, dangerous buildings, storage of hazardous chemicals or explosives and so on.
 
The object of this section basically is to safeguard the public health, safety by causing acts punishable which affects the health, well being, safety or threatens the life of people. Even if the act causes annoyance to the people then also it will amount to nuisance.
A public Nuisance is a criminal wrong, it is an act or omission that obstructs damages or causes inconvenience to the right of the community. The term public is defined in section 12 of IPC .The word public includes any class of the public or any community. Thus a class or community residing in a particular locality may come within the term public.
 
A common nuisance is not excused on the ground that it causes some convenience or advantage to a charge of public nuisance that the act in question was done. This simply means that there is no defence to a charge of committing a public nuisance that the act in question was done to prevent or mitigate some harm to the other person.
 
A Nuisance can be public or private. A private nuisance is the nuisance done to one person only but when the community at large is involved then it is termed as public nuisance. Nuisance may be permanent, continuing, recurring or even temporary nuisance. 
 
Public nuisance is not a civil wrong but a crime and it cannot be tried by a person unless the person can prove special damages but by the state only. The public nuisance comprises of all the small crimes which can cause hurt or affect health or threaten life and it is not a wrong against a specific person but is considered as a wrong against the society.
 
Section 133 Cr P C gives the power to the District Magistrate to issue conditional order after receiving the report from police office or any information and on taking such evidence as he thinks fit and in case it if found that the act or omission will harm the health, safety and well being of the public at large. A large number of activities are covered under the section including old and dangerous trees, animal, old buildings, obstruction, dangerous activities, storage and manufacture of explosives or dangerous chemicals, industries affecting health and well being.
 
No order duly made by a Magistrate under this section shall be called in question in any civil court. This section is designed to afford a rough and ready procedure for removing public nuisances. In fact, the section has been formulated to deal with emergent situations. In order to invoke Section 133(l)(a), the nuisance has got to be a public nuisance and then only it can be stated to affect the members of the public and hence can be removed from the public place.
 
The object and public purpose behind Section 133 are to prevent public nuisance that if the magistrate fails to take immediate recourse to Section 133, irreparable damage would be done to the public. However, under Section 133 no action seems possible if the nuisance has been in existence for a long period. In that case, the only remedy open to the aggrieved party is to move the civil court.



No comments: